Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Beef bottom round, cooked
Beef bottom round, cooked1
VS
Beef shank, cooked Leader
Beef shank, cooked6

Beef shank, cooked leads 6–1 · 7 categories decided · 2 ties

Beef bottom round, cooked: 100 g · Beef shank, cooked: 100 g.

The verdict

Beef shank, cooked comes out ahead, winning 6 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Beef bottom round, cooked for less sodium.

Pick Beef shank, cooked for more protein, less saturated fat, more potassium, more calcium, more iron and more magnesium.

Evenly matched on fiber and vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    230 kcal
    201 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    32.73 g
    33.68 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    —
  • Total fat
    10 g
    6.36 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    3.59 g
    2.29 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN42 mg
    64 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    264 mg
    447 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    7 mg
    32 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    2.71 mg
    3.86 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    21 mg
    30 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Beef bottom round, cooked vs Beef shank, cooked · Foodatron