Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Beef bottom round, cooked
Beef bottom round, cooked3
VS
Beef skirt steak, cooked Leader
Beef skirt steak, cooked4

Beef skirt steak, cooked leads 4–3 · 7 categories decided · 3 ties

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Beef skirt steak, cooked comes out ahead, winning 4 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Beef bottom round, cooked for more protein, less saturated fat and less sodium.

Pick Beef skirt steak, cooked for more potassium, more calcium, more iron and more magnesium.

Evenly matched on fiber, sugar and vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    230 kcal
    220 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN32.73 g
    26.13 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total fat
    10 g
    12.05 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN3.59 g
    4.67 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN42 mg
    75 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    264 mg
    289 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    7 mg
    11 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    2.71 mg
    2.77 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    21 mg
    24 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Beef bottom round, cooked vs Beef skirt steak, cooked · Foodatron