Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Beef bottom round, cooked
Beef bottom round, cooked3
VS
Beef tri-tip, cooked Leader
Beef tri-tip, cooked4

Beef tri-tip, cooked leads 4–3 · 7 categories decided · 3 ties

Both foods compared at 100 kcal.

The verdict

Beef tri-tip, cooked comes out ahead, winning 4 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Beef bottom round, cooked for less saturated fat, less sodium and more iron.

Pick Beef tri-tip, cooked for more protein, more potassium, more calcium and more magnesium.

Evenly matched on fiber, sugar and vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    100 kcal
    100 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    14.23 g
    14.7 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total fat
    4.35 g
    4.58 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN1.56 g
    1.71 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN18.26 mg
    30.22 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    114.78 mg
    186.81 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    3.04 mg
    9.34 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN1.18 mg
    0.93 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    9.13 mg
    12.64 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Beef bottom round, cooked vs Beef tri-tip, cooked · Foodatron