Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Beef bottom round, cooked
Beef bottom round, cooked3
VS
Bison, cooked Leader
Bison, cooked4

Bison, cooked leads 4–3 · 7 categories decided · 3 ties

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Bison, cooked comes out ahead, winning 4 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Beef bottom round, cooked for more protein, less saturated fat and less sodium.

Pick Bison, cooked for more potassium, more calcium, more iron and more magnesium.

Evenly matched on fiber, sugar and vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    230 kcal
    238 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN32.73 g
    23.77 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total fat
    10 g
    15.13 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN3.59 g
    6.46 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN42 mg
    73 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    264 mg
    341 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    7 mg
    13 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    2.71 mg
    3.08 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    21 mg
    22 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.