Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Beef bottom round, cooked
Beef bottom round, cooked3
VS
Goat, cooked Leader
Goat, cooked4

Goat, cooked leads 4–3 · 7 categories decided · 3 ties

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Goat, cooked comes out ahead, winning 4 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Beef bottom round, cooked for more protein, less sodium and more magnesium.

Pick Goat, cooked for less saturated fat, more potassium, more calcium and more iron.

Evenly matched on fiber, sugar and vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    230 kcal
    143 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN32.73 g
    27.1 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total fat
    10 g
    3.03 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    3.59 g
    0.93 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN42 mg
    86 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    264 mg
    405 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    7 mg
    17 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    2.71 mg
    3.73 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN21 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Beef bottom round, cooked vs Goat, cooked · Foodatron