Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Beef bottom round, cooked Leader
Beef bottom round, cooked5
VS
Ground beef, 90% lean, raw
Ground beef, 90% lean, raw2

Beef bottom round, cooked leads 5–2 · 7 categories decided · 3 ties

Beef bottom round, cooked: 100 g · Ground beef, 90% lean, raw: 100 g.

The verdict

Beef bottom round, cooked comes out ahead, winning 5 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Beef bottom round, cooked for more protein, less saturated fat, less sodium, more iron and more magnesium.

Pick Ground beef, 90% lean, raw for more potassium and more calcium.

Evenly matched on fiber, sugar and vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    230 kcal
    176 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN32.73 g
    20 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total fat
    10 g
    10 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN3.59 g
    3.93 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN42 mg
    66 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    264 mg
    321 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    7 mg
    12 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN2.71 mg
    2.24 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN21 mg
    20 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Beef bottom round, cooked vs Ground beef, 90% lean, raw · Foodatron