Beef bottom round, cooked vs Ground beef, 90% lean, cooked

Beef bottom round, cooked3

Leader

Ground beef, 90% lean, cooked4

Ground beef, 90% lean, cooked leads 4–3 · 7 categories decided · 3 ties

Both foods compared at 100 kcal.

The verdict

Ground beef, 90% lean, cooked comes out ahead, winning 4 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Beef bottom round, cooked for more protein, less saturated fat and less sodium.

Pick Ground beef, 90% lean, cooked for more potassium, more calcium, more iron and more magnesium.

Evenly matched on fiber, sugar and vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common serving Equal calories

Head-to-head

Energy
100 kcal
100 kcal
Proteinmore is better
WIN14.23 g
12.36 g
Carbohydrate
0 g
0 g
Fibermore is better
0 g
0 g
Total sugarsless is better
0 g
0 g
Total fat
4.35 g
5.24 g
Saturated fatless is better
WIN1.56 g
2.05 g
Sodiumless is better
WIN18.26 mg
36.76 mg
Potassiummore is better
114.78 mg
177.94 mgWIN
Calciummore is better
3.04 mg
7.35 mgWIN
Ironmore is better
1.18 mg
1.36 mgWIN
Magnesiummore is better
9.13 mg
11.27 mgWIN
Vitamin Cmore is better
0 mg
0 mg
Vitamin Dmore is better
—
—

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.