Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Beef bottom round, cooked
Beef bottom round, cooked3
VS
Ham, roasted
Ham, roasted3

Dead heat · 6 categories decided · 4 ties

Beef bottom round, cooked: 100 g · Ham, roasted: 100 g.

The verdict

It's a dead heat — each wins 3 of 6 match-ups.

Pick Beef bottom round, cooked for more protein, less sodium and more iron.

Pick Ham, roasted for less saturated fat, more potassium and more magnesium.

Evenly matched on fiber, sugar, calcium and vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    230 kcal
    157 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN32.73 g
    25.05 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total fat
    10 g
    5.5 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    3.59 g
    1.84 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN42 mg
    1327 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    264 mg
    316 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    7 mg
    7 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN2.71 mg
    0.94 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    21 mg
    22 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Beef bottom round, cooked vs Ham, roasted · Foodatron