Beef bottom round, cooked vs Moose, cooked

Beef bottom round, cooked1

Leader

Moose, cooked7

Moose, cooked leads 7–1 · 8 categories decided · 2 ties

Both foods compared at 100 kcal.

The verdict

Moose, cooked comes out ahead, winning 7 of 8 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Beef bottom round, cooked for less sodium.

Pick Moose, cooked for more protein, less saturated fat, more potassium, more calcium, more iron, more magnesium and more vitamin C.

Evenly matched on fiber and sugar.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common serving Equal calories

Head-to-head

Energy
100 kcal
100 kcal
Proteinmore is better
14.23 g
21.84 gWIN
Carbohydrate
0 g
0 g
Fibermore is better
0 g
0 g
Total sugarsless is better
0 g
0 g
Total fat
4.35 g
0.72 g
Saturated fatless is better
1.56 g
0.22 gWIN
Sodiumless is better
WIN18.26 mg
51.49 mg
Potassiummore is better
114.78 mg
249.25 mgWIN
Calciummore is better
3.04 mg
4.48 mgWIN
Ironmore is better
1.18 mg
3.15 mgWIN
Magnesiummore is better
9.13 mg
17.91 mgWIN
Vitamin Cmore is better
0 mg
3.73 mgWIN
Vitamin Dmore is better
—
—

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.