Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Beef bottom round, cooked Leader
Beef bottom round, cooked6
VS
Beef pastrami
Beef pastrami3

Beef bottom round, cooked leads 6–3 · 9 categories decided · 1 tie

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Beef bottom round, cooked comes out ahead, winning 6 of 9 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Beef bottom round, cooked for more protein, less sugar, less sodium, more potassium, more iron and more magnesium.

Pick Beef pastrami for less saturated fat, more calcium and more vitamin C.

Evenly matched on fiber.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    230 kcal
    147 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN32.73 g
    21.8 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0.36 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    WIN0 g
    0.1 g
  • Total fat
    10 g
    5.82 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    3.59 g
    2.68 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN42 mg
    1078 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN264 mg
    210 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    7 mg
    10 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN2.71 mg
    2.22 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN21 mg
    17 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0.3 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Beef bottom round, cooked vs Beef pastrami · Foodatron