Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Beef bottom round, cooked Leader
Beef bottom round, cooked4
VS
Pork country-style ribs, cooked
Pork country-style ribs, cooked3

Beef bottom round, cooked leads 4–3 · 7 categories decided · 3 ties

Beef bottom round, cooked: 100 g · Pork country-style ribs, cooked: 100 g.

The verdict

Beef bottom round, cooked comes out ahead, winning 4 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Beef bottom round, cooked for more protein, less saturated fat, less sodium and more iron.

Pick Pork country-style ribs, cooked for more potassium, more calcium and more magnesium.

Evenly matched on fiber, sugar and vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    230 kcal
    273 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN32.73 g
    26.49 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total fat
    10 g
    17.71 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN3.59 g
    6.3 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN42 mg
    58 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    264 mg
    288 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    7 mg
    34 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN2.71 mg
    1.34 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    21 mg
    23 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Beef bottom round, cooked vs Pork country-style ribs, cooked · Foodatron