Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Beef bottom round, cooked Leader
Beef bottom round, cooked6
VS
Pork country-style ribs, cooked
Pork country-style ribs, cooked1

Beef bottom round, cooked leads 6–1 · 7 categories decided · 3 ties

Both foods compared at 100 kcal.

The verdict

Beef bottom round, cooked comes out ahead, winning 6 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Beef bottom round, cooked for more protein, less saturated fat, less sodium, more potassium, more iron and more magnesium.

Pick Pork country-style ribs, cooked for more calcium.

Evenly matched on fiber, sugar and vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    100 kcal
    100 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN14.23 g
    9.7 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total fat
    4.35 g
    6.49 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN1.56 g
    2.31 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN18.26 mg
    21.25 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN114.78 mg
    105.49 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    3.04 mg
    12.45 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN1.18 mg
    0.49 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN9.13 mg
    8.42 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.