Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Beef bottom round, cooked Leader
Beef bottom round, cooked8
VS
Beef salami, cooked
Beef salami, cooked0

Beef bottom round, cooked leads 8–0 · 8 categories decided · 2 ties

Beef bottom round, cooked: 100 g · Beef salami, cooked: 100 g.

The verdict

Beef bottom round, cooked comes out ahead, winning 8 of 8 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Beef bottom round, cooked for more protein, less sugar, less saturated fat, less sodium, more potassium, more calcium, more iron and more magnesium.

Evenly matched on fiber and vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    230 kcal
    261 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN32.73 g
    12.6 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    1.9 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    WIN0 g
    1.5 g
  • Total fat
    10 g
    22.2 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN3.59 g
    9.87 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN42 mg
    1140 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN264 mg
    188 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN7 mg
    6 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN2.71 mg
    2.2 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN21 mg
    13 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Beef bottom round, cooked vs Beef salami, cooked · Foodatron