Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Beef bottom round, cooked
Beef bottom round, cooked2
VS
Veal cutlet, cooked Leader
Veal cutlet, cooked5

Veal cutlet, cooked leads 5–2 · 7 categories decided · 3 ties

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Veal cutlet, cooked comes out ahead, winning 5 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Beef bottom round, cooked for less sodium and more iron.

Pick Veal cutlet, cooked for more protein, less saturated fat, more potassium, more calcium and more magnesium.

Evenly matched on fiber, sugar and vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    230 kcal
    211 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    32.73 g
    36.16 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total fat
    10 g
    6.33 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    3.59 g
    2.53 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN42 mg
    67 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    264 mg
    383 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    7 mg
    8 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN2.71 mg
    1.32 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    21 mg
    29 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Beef bottom round, cooked vs Veal cutlet, cooked · Foodatron