Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Beef brisket, cooked Leader
Beef brisket, cooked4
VS
Beef heart, cooked
Beef heart, cooked2

Beef brisket, cooked leads 4–2 · 6 categories decided · 4 ties

Beef brisket, cooked: 100 g · Beef heart, cooked: 100 g.

The verdict

Beef brisket, cooked comes out ahead, winning 4 of 6 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Beef brisket, cooked for more protein, less sodium, more potassium and more calcium.

Pick Beef heart, cooked for less saturated fat and more iron.

Evenly matched on fiber, sugar, magnesium and vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    221 kcal
    165 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN32.21 g
    28.48 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0.15 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total fat
    9.24 g
    4.73 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    3.64 g
    1.4 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN52 mg
    59 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN254 mg
    219 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN17 mg
    5 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    2.75 mg
    6.38 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    21 mg
    21 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Beef brisket, cooked vs Beef heart, cooked · Foodatron