Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Beef brisket, cooked Leader
Beef brisket, cooked4
VS
Beef round, cooked
Beef round, cooked3

Beef brisket, cooked leads 4–3 · 7 categories decided · 3 ties

Beef brisket, cooked: 100 g · Beef round, cooked: 100 g.

The verdict

Beef brisket, cooked comes out ahead, winning 4 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Beef brisket, cooked for more protein, less sodium, more calcium and more magnesium.

Pick Beef round, cooked for less saturated fat, more potassium and more iron.

Evenly matched on fiber, sugar and vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    221 kcal
    163 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN32.21 g
    30.08 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total fat
    9.24 g
    4.79 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    3.64 g
    1.84 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN52 mg
    69 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    254 mg
    378 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN17 mg
    16 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    2.75 mg
    2.9 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN21 mg
    15 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Beef brisket, cooked vs Beef round, cooked · Foodatron