Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Beef brisket, cooked Leader
Beef brisket, cooked4
VS
Beef sirloin, cooked
Beef sirloin, cooked3

Beef brisket, cooked leads 4–3 · 7 categories decided · 3 ties

Beef brisket, cooked: 100 g · Beef sirloin, cooked: 100 g.

The verdict

Beef brisket, cooked comes out ahead, winning 4 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Beef brisket, cooked for more protein, less saturated fat, less sodium and more iron.

Pick Beef sirloin, cooked for more potassium, more calcium and more magnesium.

Evenly matched on fiber, sugar and vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    221 kcal
    219 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN32.21 g
    29.02 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total fat
    9.24 g
    10.54 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN3.64 g
    4.09 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN52 mg
    58 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    254 mg
    355 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    17 mg
    19 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN2.75 mg
    1.96 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    21 mg
    24 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Beef brisket, cooked vs Beef sirloin, cooked · Foodatron