Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron

Beef brisket, cooked leads 4–3 · 7 categories decided · 3 ties

Both foods compared at 100 kcal.

The verdict

Beef brisket, cooked comes out ahead, winning 4 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Beef brisket, cooked for more protein, less saturated fat, less sodium and more calcium.

Pick Ground beef, 90% lean, raw for more potassium, more iron and more magnesium.

Evenly matched on fiber, sugar and vitamin C.

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    100 kcal
    100 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN14.57 g
    11.36 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total fat
    4.18 g
    5.68 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN1.65 g
    2.23 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN23.53 mg
    37.5 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    114.93 mg
    182.39 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN7.69 mg
    6.82 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    1.24 mg
    1.27 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    9.5 mg
    11.36 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Beef brisket, cooked vs Ground beef, 90% lean, raw · Foodatron