Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Beef brisket, cooked Leader
Beef brisket, cooked4
VS
Ham, roasted
Ham, roasted3

Beef brisket, cooked leads 4–3 · 7 categories decided · 3 ties

Beef brisket, cooked: 100 g · Ham, roasted: 100 g.

The verdict

Beef brisket, cooked comes out ahead, winning 4 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Beef brisket, cooked for more protein, less sodium, more calcium and more iron.

Pick Ham, roasted for less saturated fat, more potassium and more magnesium.

Evenly matched on fiber, sugar and vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    221 kcal
    157 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN32.21 g
    25.05 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total fat
    9.24 g
    5.5 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    3.64 g
    1.84 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN52 mg
    1327 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    254 mg
    316 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN17 mg
    7 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN2.75 mg
    0.94 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    21 mg
    22 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Beef brisket, cooked vs Ham, roasted · Foodatron