Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Beef brisket, cooked
Beef brisket, cooked4
VS
Lamb liver, cooked
Lamb liver, cooked4

Dead heat · 8 categories decided · 1 tie

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

It's a dead heat — each wins 4 of 8 match-ups.

Pick Beef brisket, cooked for more protein, less sodium, more potassium and more calcium.

Pick Lamb liver, cooked for less saturated fat, more iron, more magnesium and more vitamin C.

Evenly matched on fiber.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    221 kcal
    220 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN32.21 g
    30.57 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    2.53 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    —
  • Total fat
    9.24 g
    8.81 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    3.64 g
    3.41 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN52 mg
    56 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN254 mg
    221 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN17 mg
    8 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    2.75 mg
    8.28 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    21 mg
    22 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    4 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Beef brisket, cooked vs Lamb liver, cooked · Foodatron