Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Beef brisket, cooked
Beef brisket, cooked3
VS
Moose, cooked Leader
Moose, cooked5

Moose, cooked leads 5–3 · 8 categories decided · 2 ties

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Moose, cooked comes out ahead, winning 5 of 8 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Beef brisket, cooked for more protein, less sodium and more calcium.

Pick Moose, cooked for less saturated fat, more potassium, more iron, more magnesium and more vitamin C.

Evenly matched on fiber and sugar.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    221 kcal
    134 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN32.21 g
    29.27 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total fat
    9.24 g
    0.97 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    3.64 g
    0.29 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN52 mg
    69 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    254 mg
    334 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN17 mg
    6 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    2.75 mg
    4.22 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    21 mg
    24 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    5 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Beef brisket, cooked vs Moose, cooked · Foodatron