Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Beef brisket, cooked
Beef brisket, cooked4
VS
Beef pastrami Leader
Beef pastrami5

Beef pastrami leads 5–4 · 9 categories decided · 1 tie

Both foods compared at 100 kcal.

The verdict

Beef pastrami comes out ahead, winning 5 of 9 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Beef brisket, cooked for less sugar, less saturated fat, less sodium and more calcium.

Pick Beef pastrami for more protein, more potassium, more iron, more magnesium and more vitamin C.

Evenly matched on fiber.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    100 kcal
    100 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    14.57 g
    14.83 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0.24 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    WIN0 g
    0.07 g
  • Total fat
    4.18 g
    3.96 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN1.65 g
    1.82 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN23.53 mg
    733.33 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    114.93 mg
    142.86 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN7.69 mg
    6.8 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    1.24 mg
    1.51 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    9.5 mg
    11.56 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0.2 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Beef brisket, cooked vs Beef pastrami · Foodatron