Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Beef brisket, cooked Leader
Beef brisket, cooked5
VS
Pork blade chop, cooked
Pork blade chop, cooked2

Beef brisket, cooked leads 5–2 · 7 categories decided · 3 ties

Beef brisket, cooked: 100 g · Pork blade chop, cooked: 100 g.

The verdict

Beef brisket, cooked comes out ahead, winning 5 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Beef brisket, cooked for more protein, less saturated fat, less sodium, more iron and more magnesium.

Pick Pork blade chop, cooked for more potassium and more calcium.

Evenly matched on fiber, sugar and vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    221 kcal
    255 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN32.21 g
    26.54 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total fat
    9.24 g
    15.71 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN3.64 g
    4.49 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN52 mg
    69 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    254 mg
    259 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    17 mg
    51 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN2.75 mg
    0.81 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN21 mg
    19 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Beef brisket, cooked vs Pork blade chop, cooked · Foodatron