Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron

Chili con carne with beans leads 7–3 · 10 categories decided

Beef broth: 100 g · Chili con carne with beans: 100 g.

The verdict

Chili con carne with beans comes out ahead, winning 7 of 10 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Beef broth for less sugar, less saturated fat and less sodium.

Pick Chili con carne with beans for more protein, more fiber, more potassium, more calcium, more iron, more magnesium and more vitamin C.

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    7 kcal
    107 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    1.14 g
    5.8 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    0.04 g
    13.1 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    3.3 gWIN
  • Total sugarsless is better
    WIN0 g
    1.87 g
  • Total fat
    0.22 g
    3.47 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN0.11 g
    1.25 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN372 mg
    449 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    54 mg
    264 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    6 mg
    33 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    0.17 mg
    1.34 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    2 mg
    28 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0.2 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Dmore is better

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Beef broth vs Chili con carne with beans · Foodatron