Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Plate
Beef chuck roast, cooked Leader
Beef chuck roast, cooked4
VS
6 Premium Pork Sausages1

Beef chuck roast, cooked leads 4–1 · 5 categories decided

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Beef chuck roast, cooked comes out ahead, winning 4 of 5 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Beef chuck roast, cooked for more protein, less sugar, less saturated fat and less sodium.

Pick 6 Premium Pork Sausages for more fiber.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    283 kcal
    241 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN29.23 g
    14.8 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    1 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0.1 gWIN
  • Total sugarsless is better
    WIN0 g
    0.5 g
  • Total fat
    17.56 g
    19.7 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN6.91 g
    8.6 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN48 mg
    540 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    235 mg
    —
  • Calciummore is better
    17 mg
    —
  • Ironmore is better
    2.38 mg
    —
  • Magnesiummore is better
    19 mg
    —
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    —
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.