Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Beef chuck roast, cooked Leader
Beef chuck roast, cooked6
VS
Bologna
Bologna3

Beef chuck roast, cooked leads 6–3 · 9 categories decided · 1 tie

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Beef chuck roast, cooked comes out ahead, winning 6 of 9 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Beef chuck roast, cooked for more protein, less sugar, less saturated fat, less sodium, more iron and more magnesium.

Pick Bologna for more potassium, more calcium and more vitamin C.

Evenly matched on fiber.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    283 kcal
    308 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN29.23 g
    15.2 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    5.49 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    WIN0 g
    4.42 g
  • Total fat
    17.56 g
    24.59 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN6.91 g
    9.3 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN48 mg
    960 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    235 mg
    315 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    17 mg
    85 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN2.38 mg
    1.21 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN19 mg
    17 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0.8 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Beef chuck roast, cooked vs Bologna · Foodatron