Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Beef chuck roast, cooked
Beef chuck roast, cooked1
VS
Caribou, cooked Leader
Caribou, cooked7

Caribou, cooked leads 7–1 · 8 categories decided · 2 ties

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Caribou, cooked comes out ahead, winning 7 of 8 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Beef chuck roast, cooked for less sodium.

Pick Caribou, cooked for more protein, less saturated fat, more potassium, more calcium, more iron, more magnesium and more vitamin C.

Evenly matched on fiber and sugar.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    283 kcal
    167 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    29.23 g
    29.77 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total fat
    17.56 g
    4.42 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    6.91 g
    1.7 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN48 mg
    60 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    235 mg
    310 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    17 mg
    22 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    2.38 mg
    6.17 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    19 mg
    27 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    3 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Beef chuck roast, cooked vs Caribou, cooked · Foodatron