Beef chuck roast, cooked vs Pork belly

Leader

Beef chuck roast, cooked6

Pork belly2

Beef chuck roast, cooked leads 6–2 · 8 categories decided · 2 ties

Both foods compared at 100 kcal.

The verdict

Beef chuck roast, cooked comes out ahead, winning 6 of 8 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Beef chuck roast, cooked for more protein, less saturated fat, more potassium, more calcium, more iron and more magnesium.

Pick Pork belly for less sodium and more vitamin C.

Evenly matched on fiber and sugar.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common serving Equal calories

Head-to-head

Energy
100 kcal
100 kcal
Proteinmore is better
WIN10.33 g
1.8 g
Carbohydrate
0 g
0 g
Fibermore is better
0 g
0 g
Total sugarsless is better
0 g
0 g
Total fat
6.2 g
10.23 g
Saturated fatless is better
WIN2.44 g
3.73 g
Sodiumless is better
16.96 mg
6.18 mgWIN
Potassiummore is better
WIN83.04 mg
35.71 mg
Calciummore is better
WIN6.01 mg
0.97 mg
Ironmore is better
WIN0.84 mg
0.1 mg
Magnesiummore is better
WIN6.71 mg
0.77 mg
Vitamin Cmore is better
0 mg
0.06 mgWIN
Vitamin Dmore is better
—
—

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.