Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Beef chuck roast, cooked
Beef chuck roast, cooked4
VS
Pork frankfurter (hot dog) Leader
Pork frankfurter (hot dog)5

Pork frankfurter (hot dog) leads 5–4 · 9 categories decided · 1 tie

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Pork frankfurter (hot dog) comes out ahead, winning 5 of 9 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Beef chuck roast, cooked for more protein, less saturated fat, less sodium and more magnesium.

Pick Pork frankfurter (hot dog) for more fiber, more potassium, more calcium, more iron and more vitamin C.

Evenly matched on sugar.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    283 kcal
    269 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN29.23 g
    12.81 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0.28 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0.1 gWIN
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total fat
    17.56 g
    23.68 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN6.91 g
    8.72 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN48 mg
    816 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    235 mg
    264 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    17 mg
    267 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    2.38 mg
    3.7 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN19 mg
    15 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    2 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Beef chuck roast, cooked vs Pork frankfurter (hot dog) · Foodatron