Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Beef chuck roast, cooked
Beef chuck roast, cooked4
VS
Pork frankfurter (hot dog) Leader
Pork frankfurter (hot dog)5

Pork frankfurter (hot dog) leads 5–4 · 9 categories decided · 1 tie

Both foods compared at 100 kcal.

The verdict

Pork frankfurter (hot dog) comes out ahead, winning 5 of 9 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Beef chuck roast, cooked for more protein, less saturated fat, less sodium and more magnesium.

Pick Pork frankfurter (hot dog) for more fiber, more potassium, more calcium, more iron and more vitamin C.

Evenly matched on sugar.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    100 kcal
    100 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN10.33 g
    4.76 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0.1 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0.04 gWIN
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total fat
    6.2 g
    8.8 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN2.44 g
    3.24 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN16.96 mg
    303.35 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    83.04 mg
    98.14 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    6.01 mg
    99.26 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    0.84 mg
    1.38 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN6.71 mg
    5.58 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0.74 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Beef chuck roast, cooked vs Pork frankfurter (hot dog) · Foodatron