Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Beef eye of round, cooked Leader
Beef eye of round, cooked5
VS
Ground beef, 95% lean, cooked
Ground beef, 95% lean, cooked2

Beef eye of round, cooked leads 5–2 · 7 categories decided · 3 ties

Both foods compared at 100 kcal.

The verdict

Beef eye of round, cooked comes out ahead, winning 5 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Beef eye of round, cooked for more protein, less saturated fat, less sodium, more potassium and more calcium.

Pick Ground beef, 95% lean, cooked for more iron and more magnesium.

Evenly matched on fiber, sugar and vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    100 kcal
    100 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN17.42 g
    15.73 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total fat
    2.82 g
    3.62 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN0.97 g
    1.58 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN38.6 mg
    43.29 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN238.6 mg
    229.27 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN9.36 mg
    5.49 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    1.09 mg
    1.74 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    8.77 mg
    14.63 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Beef eye of round, cooked vs Ground beef, 95% lean, cooked · Foodatron