Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Beef eye of round, cooked
Beef eye of round, cooked1
VS
Beef shank, cooked Leader
Beef shank, cooked6

Beef shank, cooked leads 6–1 · 7 categories decided · 2 ties

Beef eye of round, cooked: 100 g · Beef shank, cooked: 100 g.

The verdict

Beef shank, cooked comes out ahead, winning 6 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Beef eye of round, cooked for less saturated fat.

Pick Beef shank, cooked for more protein, less sodium, more potassium, more calcium, more iron and more magnesium.

Evenly matched on fiber and vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    171 kcal
    201 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    29.79 g
    33.68 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    —
  • Total fat
    4.83 g
    6.36 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN1.66 g
    2.29 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    66 mg
    64 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    408 mg
    447 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    16 mg
    32 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    1.86 mg
    3.86 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    15 mg
    30 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Beef eye of round, cooked vs Beef shank, cooked · Foodatron