Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Beef eye of round, cooked
Beef eye of round, cooked3
VS
Beef sirloin, cooked Leader
Beef sirloin, cooked4

Beef sirloin, cooked leads 4–3 · 7 categories decided · 3 ties

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Beef sirloin, cooked comes out ahead, winning 4 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Beef eye of round, cooked for more protein, less saturated fat and more potassium.

Pick Beef sirloin, cooked for less sodium, more calcium, more iron and more magnesium.

Evenly matched on fiber, sugar and vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    171 kcal
    219 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN29.79 g
    29.02 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total fat
    4.83 g
    10.54 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN1.66 g
    4.09 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    66 mg
    58 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN408 mg
    355 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    16 mg
    19 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    1.86 mg
    1.96 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    15 mg
    24 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Beef eye of round, cooked vs Beef sirloin, cooked · Foodatron