Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Beef eye of round, cooked Leader
Beef eye of round, cooked4
VS
Ground beef, 90% lean, raw
Ground beef, 90% lean, raw2

Beef eye of round, cooked leads 4–2 · 6 categories decided · 4 ties

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Beef eye of round, cooked comes out ahead, winning 4 of 6 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Beef eye of round, cooked for more protein, less saturated fat, more potassium and more calcium.

Pick Ground beef, 90% lean, raw for more iron and more magnesium.

Evenly matched on fiber, sugar, sodium and vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    171 kcal
    176 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN29.79 g
    20 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total fat
    4.83 g
    10 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN1.66 g
    3.93 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    66 mg
    66 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN408 mg
    321 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN16 mg
    12 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    1.86 mg
    2.24 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    15 mg
    20 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Beef eye of round, cooked vs Ground beef, 90% lean, raw · Foodatron