Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Beef eye of round, cooked Leader
Beef eye of round, cooked4
VS
Lamb leg, cooked
Lamb leg, cooked3

Beef eye of round, cooked leads 4–3 · 7 categories decided · 2 ties

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Beef eye of round, cooked comes out ahead, winning 4 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Beef eye of round, cooked for more protein, less saturated fat, more potassium and more calcium.

Pick Lamb leg, cooked for less sodium, more iron and more magnesium.

Evenly matched on fiber and vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    171 kcal
    246 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN29.79 g
    24.81 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    —
  • Total fat
    4.83 g
    15.56 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN1.66 g
    7.61 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    66 mg
    43 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN408 mg
    167 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN16 mg
    10 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    1.86 mg
    2.1 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    15 mg
    20 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Beef eye of round, cooked vs Lamb leg, cooked · Foodatron