Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Beef eye of round, cooked
Beef eye of round, cooked3
VS
Lamb loin chop, cooked Leader
Lamb loin chop, cooked4

Lamb loin chop, cooked leads 4–3 · 7 categories decided · 3 ties

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Lamb loin chop, cooked comes out ahead, winning 4 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Beef eye of round, cooked for more protein, less saturated fat and more potassium.

Pick Lamb loin chop, cooked for less sodium, more calcium, more iron and more magnesium.

Evenly matched on fiber, sugar and vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    171 kcal
    315 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN29.79 g
    23.43 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total fat
    4.83 g
    23.88 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN1.66 g
    11.96 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    66 mg
    49 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN408 mg
    159 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    16 mg
    23 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    1.86 mg
    2.05 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    15 mg
    19 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Beef eye of round, cooked vs Lamb loin chop, cooked · Foodatron