Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Beef eye of round, cooked Leader
Beef eye of round, cooked4
VS
Pork chop, cooked
Pork chop, cooked3

Beef eye of round, cooked leads 4–3 · 7 categories decided · 3 ties

Beef eye of round, cooked: 100 g · Pork chop, cooked: 100 g.

The verdict

Beef eye of round, cooked comes out ahead, winning 4 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Beef eye of round, cooked for more protein, less saturated fat, more potassium and more iron.

Pick Pork chop, cooked for less sodium, more calcium and more magnesium.

Evenly matched on fiber, sugar and vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    171 kcal
    209 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN29.79 g
    25.61 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total fat
    4.83 g
    11.06 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN1.66 g
    3.52 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    66 mg
    55 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN408 mg
    344 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    16 mg
    24 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN1.86 mg
    0.79 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    15 mg
    25 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Beef eye of round, cooked vs Pork chop, cooked · Foodatron