Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Beef eye of round, cooked
Beef eye of round, cooked3
VS
Pork tenderloin, cooked Leader
Pork tenderloin, cooked4

Pork tenderloin, cooked leads 4–3 · 7 categories decided · 3 ties

Beef eye of round, cooked: 100 g · Pork tenderloin, cooked: 100 g.

The verdict

Pork tenderloin, cooked comes out ahead, winning 4 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Beef eye of round, cooked for more protein, more calcium and more iron.

Pick Pork tenderloin, cooked for less saturated fat, less sodium, more potassium and more magnesium.

Evenly matched on fiber, sugar and vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    171 kcal
    143 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN29.79 g
    26.17 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total fat
    4.83 g
    3.51 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    1.66 g
    1.2 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    66 mg
    57 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    408 mg
    421 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN16 mg
    6 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN1.86 mg
    1.15 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    15 mg
    29 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Beef eye of round, cooked vs Pork tenderloin, cooked · Foodatron