Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Beef eye of round, cooked Leader
Beef eye of round, cooked7
VS
Beef salami, cooked
Beef salami, cooked1

Beef eye of round, cooked leads 7–1 · 8 categories decided · 2 ties

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Beef eye of round, cooked comes out ahead, winning 7 of 8 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Beef eye of round, cooked for more protein, less sugar, less saturated fat, less sodium, more potassium, more calcium and more magnesium.

Pick Beef salami, cooked for more iron.

Evenly matched on fiber and vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    171 kcal
    261 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN29.79 g
    12.6 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    1.9 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    WIN0 g
    1.5 g
  • Total fat
    4.83 g
    22.2 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN1.66 g
    9.87 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN66 mg
    1140 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN408 mg
    188 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN16 mg
    6 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    1.86 mg
    2.2 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN15 mg
    13 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Beef eye of round, cooked vs Beef salami, cooked · Foodatron