Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Beef eye of round, cooked Leader
Beef eye of round, cooked5
VS
Veal cutlet, cooked
Veal cutlet, cooked2

Beef eye of round, cooked leads 5–2 · 7 categories decided · 3 ties

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Beef eye of round, cooked comes out ahead, winning 5 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Beef eye of round, cooked for less saturated fat, less sodium, more potassium, more calcium and more iron.

Pick Veal cutlet, cooked for more protein and more magnesium.

Evenly matched on fiber, sugar and vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    171 kcal
    211 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    29.79 g
    36.16 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total fat
    4.83 g
    6.33 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN1.66 g
    2.53 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN66 mg
    67 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN408 mg
    383 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN16 mg
    8 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN1.86 mg
    1.32 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    15 mg
    29 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Beef eye of round, cooked vs Veal cutlet, cooked · Foodatron