Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Beef flank steak, cooked Leader
Beef flank steak, cooked5
VS
Beef liver, raw
Beef liver, raw3

Beef flank steak, cooked leads 5–3 · 8 categories decided · 2 ties

Beef flank steak, cooked: 100 g · Beef liver, raw: 100 g.

The verdict

Beef flank steak, cooked comes out ahead, winning 5 of 8 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Beef flank steak, cooked for more protein, less sodium, more potassium, more calcium and more magnesium.

Pick Beef liver, raw for less saturated fat, more iron and more vitamin C.

Evenly matched on fiber and sugar.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    202 kcal
    135 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN27.55 g
    20.36 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    3.89 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total fat
    9.31 g
    3.63 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    3.84 g
    1.23 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN53 mg
    69 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN326 mg
    313 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN18 mg
    5 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    1.8 mg
    4.9 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN22 mg
    18 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    1.3 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Beef flank steak, cooked vs Beef liver, raw · Foodatron