Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Beef flank steak, cooked Leader
Beef flank steak, cooked6
VS
Bison, cooked
Bison, cooked1

Beef flank steak, cooked leads 6–1 · 7 categories decided · 3 ties

Both foods compared at 100 kcal.

The verdict

Beef flank steak, cooked comes out ahead, winning 6 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Beef flank steak, cooked for more protein, less saturated fat, less sodium, more potassium, more calcium and more magnesium.

Pick Bison, cooked for more iron.

Evenly matched on fiber, sugar and vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    100 kcal
    100 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN13.64 g
    9.99 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total fat
    4.61 g
    6.36 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN1.9 g
    2.71 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN26.24 mg
    30.67 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN161.39 mg
    143.28 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN8.91 mg
    5.46 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    0.89 mg
    1.29 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN10.89 mg
    9.24 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.