Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Beef flank steak, cooked Leader
Beef flank steak, cooked7
VS
Italian sausage, cooked
Italian sausage, cooked1

Beef flank steak, cooked leads 7–1 · 8 categories decided · 2 ties

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Beef flank steak, cooked comes out ahead, winning 7 of 8 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Beef flank steak, cooked for more protein, less sugar, less saturated fat, less sodium, more calcium, more iron and more magnesium.

Pick Italian sausage, cooked for more potassium.

Evenly matched on fiber and vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    202 kcal
    324 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN27.55 g
    18.4 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    1.86 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    WIN0 g
    1.42 g
  • Total fat
    9.31 g
    26.4 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN3.84 g
    9.03 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN53 mg
    801 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    326 mg
    339 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN18 mg
    13 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN1.8 mg
    1.25 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN22 mg
    19 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Beef flank steak, cooked vs Italian sausage, cooked · Foodatron