Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Beef flank steak, cooked Leader
Beef flank steak, cooked5
VS
Lamb leg, cooked
Lamb leg, cooked2

Beef flank steak, cooked leads 5–2 · 7 categories decided · 2 ties

Beef flank steak, cooked: 100 g · Lamb leg, cooked: 100 g.

The verdict

Beef flank steak, cooked comes out ahead, winning 5 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Beef flank steak, cooked for more protein, less saturated fat, more potassium, more calcium and more magnesium.

Pick Lamb leg, cooked for less sodium and more iron.

Evenly matched on fiber and vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    202 kcal
    246 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN27.55 g
    24.81 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    —
  • Total fat
    9.31 g
    15.56 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN3.84 g
    7.61 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    53 mg
    43 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN326 mg
    167 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN18 mg
    10 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    1.8 mg
    2.1 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN22 mg
    20 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Beef flank steak, cooked vs Lamb leg, cooked · Foodatron