Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Beef flank steak, cooked
Beef flank steak, cooked2
VS
Moose, cooked Leader
Moose, cooked6

Moose, cooked leads 6–2 · 8 categories decided · 2 ties

Beef flank steak, cooked: 100 g · Moose, cooked: 100 g.

The verdict

Moose, cooked comes out ahead, winning 6 of 8 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Beef flank steak, cooked for less sodium and more calcium.

Pick Moose, cooked for more protein, less saturated fat, more potassium, more iron, more magnesium and more vitamin C.

Evenly matched on fiber and sugar.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    202 kcal
    134 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    27.55 g
    29.27 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total fat
    9.31 g
    0.97 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    3.84 g
    0.29 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN53 mg
    69 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    326 mg
    334 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN18 mg
    6 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    1.8 mg
    4.22 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    22 mg
    24 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    5 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Beef flank steak, cooked vs Moose, cooked · Foodatron