Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Beef flank steak, cooked
Beef flank steak, cooked4
VS
Beef pastrami Leader
Beef pastrami5

Beef pastrami leads 5–4 · 9 categories decided · 1 tie

Both foods compared at 100 kcal.

The verdict

Beef pastrami comes out ahead, winning 5 of 9 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Beef flank steak, cooked for less sugar, less sodium, more potassium and more calcium.

Pick Beef pastrami for more protein, less saturated fat, more iron, more magnesium and more vitamin C.

Evenly matched on fiber.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    100 kcal
    100 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    13.64 g
    14.83 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0.24 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    WIN0 g
    0.07 g
  • Total fat
    4.61 g
    3.96 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    1.9 g
    1.82 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN26.24 mg
    733.33 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN161.39 mg
    142.86 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN8.91 mg
    6.8 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    0.89 mg
    1.51 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    10.89 mg
    11.56 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0.2 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Beef flank steak, cooked vs Beef pastrami · Foodatron