Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Beef flank steak, cooked Leader
Beef flank steak, cooked5
VS
Pork frankfurter (hot dog)
Pork frankfurter (hot dog)4

Beef flank steak, cooked leads 5–4 · 9 categories decided · 1 tie

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Beef flank steak, cooked comes out ahead, winning 5 of 9 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Beef flank steak, cooked for more protein, less saturated fat, less sodium, more potassium and more magnesium.

Pick Pork frankfurter (hot dog) for more fiber, more calcium, more iron and more vitamin C.

Evenly matched on sugar.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    202 kcal
    269 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN27.55 g
    12.81 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0.28 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0.1 gWIN
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total fat
    9.31 g
    23.68 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN3.84 g
    8.72 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN53 mg
    816 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN326 mg
    264 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    18 mg
    267 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    1.8 mg
    3.7 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN22 mg
    15 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    2 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Beef flank steak, cooked vs Pork frankfurter (hot dog) · Foodatron