Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Beef flank steak, cooked Leader
Beef flank steak, cooked5
VS
Pork frankfurter (hot dog)
Pork frankfurter (hot dog)4

Beef flank steak, cooked leads 5–4 · 9 categories decided · 1 tie

Both foods compared at 100 kcal.

The verdict

Beef flank steak, cooked comes out ahead, winning 5 of 9 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Beef flank steak, cooked for more protein, less saturated fat, less sodium, more potassium and more magnesium.

Pick Pork frankfurter (hot dog) for more fiber, more calcium, more iron and more vitamin C.

Evenly matched on sugar.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    100 kcal
    100 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN13.64 g
    4.76 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0.1 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0.04 gWIN
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total fat
    4.61 g
    8.8 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN1.9 g
    3.24 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN26.24 mg
    303.35 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN161.39 mg
    98.14 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    8.91 mg
    99.26 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    0.89 mg
    1.38 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN10.89 mg
    5.58 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0.74 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Beef flank steak, cooked vs Pork frankfurter (hot dog) · Foodatron