Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Beef flank steak, cooked
Beef flank steak, cooked4
VS
Ground pork, cooked
Ground pork, cooked4

Dead heat · 8 categories decided · 2 ties

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

It's a dead heat — each wins 4 of 8 match-ups.

Pick Beef flank steak, cooked for more protein, less saturated fat, less sodium and more iron.

Pick Ground pork, cooked for more potassium, more calcium, more magnesium and more vitamin C.

Evenly matched on fiber and sugar.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    202 kcal
    297 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN27.55 g
    25.69 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total fat
    9.31 g
    20.77 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN3.84 g
    7.72 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN53 mg
    73 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    326 mg
    362 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    18 mg
    22 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN1.8 mg
    1.29 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    22 mg
    24 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0.7 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Beef flank steak, cooked vs Ground pork, cooked · Foodatron