Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Beef flank steak, cooked Leader
Beef flank steak, cooked5
VS
Pork sirloin, cooked
Pork sirloin, cooked2

Beef flank steak, cooked leads 5–2 · 7 categories decided · 3 ties

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Beef flank steak, cooked comes out ahead, winning 5 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Beef flank steak, cooked for more protein, less saturated fat, less sodium, more calcium and more iron.

Pick Pork sirloin, cooked for more potassium and more magnesium.

Evenly matched on fiber, sugar and vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    202 kcal
    230 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN27.55 g
    26.64 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total fat
    9.31 g
    12.87 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN3.84 g
    4.11 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN53 mg
    57 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    326 mg
    340 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN18 mg
    15 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN1.8 mg
    0.94 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    22 mg
    25 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Beef flank steak, cooked vs Pork sirloin, cooked · Foodatron